A Contrast of Lovers An Analysis of “To His Coy Mistress” and “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock”

Type :

Presentation

Pages :

4 pages

Format :

.doc

Published date :

05/01/2008

Category :

Philosophy & literature

Sub category :

Literature

Oboulo.com selection criteria

$ 6.95 Add to cart

Summary :

Introduction
Behind Marvell's poetry
The different structures of every poem
The tone of each poem
The speaker in Marvell's poem
To roll of the sweetness and strength
The stress on patience
Conclusion
Works cited

Abstract

Is it better to have loved and lost, than never loved at all? When considering the abstractness and relativity of love, poetry is an art form unrivaled. T.S. Eliot and Andrew Marvell, each poets of incredible vision, analyzed love in two entirely different lights while concurrently capturing identical aspects. One of Eliot's earliest poems, "the love song of J. alfred prufrock," stars a lonely, brooding speaker incapable of mustering up the courage to pursue love. In Marvell's "To his coy mistress," the poem features one sly speaker attempting to woo a young woman into bed. Both poems analyze the topic of love, and more importantly, its elusiveness. T.S. Eliot was a young man when he wrote his poem in the early twentieth century. Andrew Marvell, generally recognized as a pious Anglican Christian poet, published his surprisingly out of character poem posthumously. Why is it that these two poems, entirely different in everything from construct to tone to time period, are capable of capturing the demons and trials man must overcome when pursuing love? They are each writers with command over a variety of poetic tools. Each alludes to Classical and Biblical references, and each is unique in its perspective. the speakers in both poems have the same goal, but only Marvell is directed towards an actual person. On the other hand, the fictitious prufrock of Eliot's design is introverted.