Anthropological and historical perspectives on the death of Captain Cook
extension 7 word format
document in English
journalism journalism
 
presentation
published 10/09/2008
 
review : Completed
level : Advanced
requested 1 times
 
section Summary
 
 
Scientific and philosophical thought have been preoccupied with the problem of an objective, empirical reality whose nature is discoverable and quantifiable at least since Descartes. This theoretical trend continued and culminated in the discoveries and ideas of Isaac Newton. The Apotheosis of Captain Cook, by Gananath Obeyesekere, is similarly, though subtly, and perhaps unintentionally, concerned with such a reality. In fact, an objective, empirical reality is fundamental to Obeyesekere’s argument in The Apotheosis…, which states, in part, that the Hawaiians whom Cook encountered in the winter of 1778-1779 (Cook died at the hand of the Hawaiians in 1779) were essentially “rational” beings who were able to discern such a “universal” reality (Sahlins 39).
Marshall Sahlins, on the other hand, whose early work Obeyesekere is responding to with The Apotheosis… and who wrote How Natives Think…About Captain Cook for Example as a counterargument to Obeyesekere’s book, argues that the native Hawaiians interpreted Cook’s arrival within the context of their own culture’s belief system. They interpreted Cook’s arrival as the arrival of the god “Lono,” a Hawaiian fertility god.
 
 

Table of Contents Anthropological and historical perspectives on the death of Captain Cook Table of Contents

 
  1. Introduction.
  2. Sahlins critical view of Obeyesekere's argument.
  3. Obeyesekere's analysis of events.
  4. The Hawaiian creation myth that underlies the Makahiki festival.
  5. Conclusion.
 
 
section Latest in the category journalism
 
 
 
section From the same author