Anthropological and historical perspectives on the death of Captain Cook
$6.95
journalism
presentation
published 10/09/2008
review : Completed
level : Advanced
requested 1 times
Scientific and philosophical thought have been preoccupied with the problem of an objective, empirical reality whose nature is discoverable and quantifiable at least since Descartes. This theoretical trend continued and culminated in the discoveries and ideas of Isaac Newton. The Apotheosis of Captain Cook, by Gananath Obeyesekere, is similarly, though subtly, and perhaps unintentionally, concerned with such a reality. In fact, an objective, empirical reality is fundamental to Obeyesekeres argument in The Apotheosis
, which states, in part, that the Hawaiians whom Cook encountered in the winter of 1778-1779 (Cook died at the hand of the Hawaiians in 1779) were essentially rational beings who were able to discern such a universal reality (Sahlins 39).
Marshall Sahlins, on the other hand, whose early work Obeyesekere is responding to with The Apotheosis and who wrote How Natives Think About Captain Cook for Example as a counterargument to Obeyesekeres book, argues that the native Hawaiians interpreted Cooks arrival within the context of their own cultures belief system. They interpreted Cooks arrival as the arrival of the god Lono, a Hawaiian fertility god.
Marshall Sahlins, on the other hand, whose early work Obeyesekere is responding to with The Apotheosis and who wrote How Natives Think About Captain Cook for Example as a counterargument to Obeyesekeres book, argues that the native Hawaiians interpreted Cooks arrival within the context of their own cultures belief system. They interpreted Cooks arrival as the arrival of the god Lono, a Hawaiian fertility god.
Table of Contents
- Introduction.
- Sahlins critical view of Obeyesekere's argument.
- Obeyesekere's analysis of events.
- The Hawaiian creation myth that underlies the Makahiki festival.
- Conclusion.
