Appeals to Ethos and Pathos in Eugene V. Debs’ “Statement to the Court”

Type :

Presentation

Pages :

3 pages

Format :

.doc

Published date :

02/19/2008

Category :

History & geography

Sub category :

Modern history

Oboulo.com selection criteria

$ 5.95 Add to cart

Summary :

Introduction
Debs' bond with his audience
The way in which Debs focuses on shared American values
His pathetic appeal
Making persuasive appeals to pathos
Conclusion
Works cited

Abstract

In June of 1918, eugene Victor debs was arrested for a speech he gave in Canton, Ohio in which he criticized the United States government for its involvement in World War I. He publicly discouraged young men from enlisting in the armed forces and was arrested for violating the Sedition Act of 1918. The Sedition Act, an amendment to the Espionage Act of 1917, further restricted American citizens from speaking or publishing opinions that were disloyal, profane, or abusive toward the federal government (Tussey, 281).
debs stood trial in the fall of 1918 and knowing he would undoubtedly be found guilty on at least one of the ten counts he faced, he used his trial as a public forum to promote his socialist ideals. According to biographer Ray Ginger, "The attorney's realized that the best weapons available were the personality and philosophy of eugene debs" (363). On September 18, 1918, debs addressed the court before receiving a prison sentence of ten years. His plea to socialism and contention that the Sedition Act violated the first amendment rests upon solid logical appeal. However, the political and social climate was such that his audience - which ranged from fellow Marxists packed into a tiny Cleveland court room to unsympathetic, capitalist Americans - remained unmoved by a logical appeal. Rather, it is his appeal to both ethos and pathos that allowed him to capture the attention of the American public.