Did Thatcherism bring an end to the ‘post-war consensus?’

Type :

Presentation

Pages :

7 pages

Format :

.doc

Published date :

01/15/2009

Category :

History & geography

Sub category :

Modern history

Oboulo.com selection criteria

$ 14.95 Add to cart

Summary :

Introduction.
The conventional point of view: The end of consensus.
1. What was the 'postwar consensus'?
2. The consensus and Thatcher's election as Prime Minister.
3. Thatcher's policies and the end of the consensus period.
Criticism to the conventional view.
1. Consensus broken before Thatcher came into power.
2. The postwar consensus: Not that strong and already broken in 1979.
3. Thatcher's project.
My opinion.
Bibliography.

Abstract

Since 1979 the so-called 'Thatcher experiment' or the 'thatcherism' was at the centre of many debates, partly because Mrs Thatcher's government has broken with many features of the postwar consensus and partly because her government's record is contested (Kavanagh, 1987, p1). But above all, the term 'thatcherism' need to be define. There are three main visions of thatcherism. Generally, for the authors, this is a purely political phenomenon, characterized by Mrs Thatcher's personality and style of leadership and her way to govern (King 1985; Minogue and Biddiss 1987; Jenkins 1987), a breakdown with the postwar policy consensus (Kavanagh, 1990; Kavanagh and Morris 1994) and traditional forms of Conservative Party's way of governing (Bulpitt, 1986). Others emphasize the ideological dimension of thatcherism (Hall, S. 1979; Hay 1996). To them, the Thatcher project represented an alternative to social democracy, set up around a New Right discourse. Finally, for some writers, thatcherism is, in economic terms, a national response to international crises (Jessop, 1988; Taylor, 1992; Overbeek, 1990). Actually, I will consider 'thatcherism' as the style of leadership of Mrs Thatcher, her ideology and her politics.