Karlene Kincaid v. River Bluffs Community College : Appeal
$7.95
8 word format
document in English
civil law
school essay
published 19/12/2007
review : Completed
level : Advanced
requested 0 times
Summary
This appeal is from the order granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Western Division. The District Court had jurisdiction over this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (2002) because this case arises under the First Amendment of the Constitution and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2002). This Court has jurisdiction over the present appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2002) because the appeal is from a final order of the United States District Court. The order granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is considered to be a final order because it disposed of all the parties’ claims. Gordon v. City of Kansas City, 241 F.3d 997, 999 (8th Cir. 2001). The order was entered by the District Court on February 14, 2003, and the notice of appeal was filed on February 26, 2003.
Table of Contents
- Table of authorities.
- Statement of jurisdiction.
- Statement of issues presented.
- Statement of the case.
- Statement of the facts.
- Summary of the argument.
- Argument.
- Standard of Review.
- Introduction.
- When a speech activity occurs within a classroom setting.
- Dr. Kincaid's letter to the editor.
- Conclusion.
Latest in the category civil law From the same author
knowledge network
