Keynesian economics: The transition to the Washington consensus
Summary :
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- The Keynesian revolution
- Understanding Keynesian theory
- Bretton Woods: Postwar reconstruction
- The golden age
- Keynesian economic model
- The Washington consensus: Cutting through red tape
- The Stagflation crisis of the 1970s
- Conclusions
- Works cited
Abstract
Recent political events concerning the international economic downturn have revived the discussion of keynesian economic theory due to the apparent failure of free market neo-liberalism. On 26 September, 2008, French President Nicolas Sarkozy remarked that "we must rethink the financial system from scratch, as at Bretton Woods" [Parker, Barber, Dombey, 2008] while this sentiment was echoed by British Prime Minister Gordon Brown on 2 April, 2009, at the G-20 Conference in London when he declared an end to the "washington consensus" previously directing global economic policy [Sparrow, Baldwin and Stewart, 2009]. As such, the history of twentieth-century economics requires elucidation in order to explore the faults with the neo-liberal model, and to comprehend the keynesian model which preceded it during the postwar recovery. Its establishment as a consequence to the Great Depression (1929-32) in America, and as a product of the Bretton Woods Conference (1944), would see the keynesian model implemented as the guiding framework for global reconstruction and wealth-building following the Second World War until its replacement in the 1970s by the neo-liberal washington consensus of John Williamson. This latter shift will be explained as a movement against the keynesian consensus between government and business, and as a re-formulation and continuation of classical liberal (or neo-classical) economic theory.
The paper aims to consider the replacement of keynesian by neo-liberal economic theory, and to establish whether or not the process was inevitable. In order to analyze this hypothesis, it will first establish the history of keynesian economics through as a reaction to conditions which provided for the financial collapse of the Great Depression, and its implementation at Bretton Woods.
The paper aims to consider the replacement of keynesian by neo-liberal economic theory, and to establish whether or not the process was inevitable. In order to analyze this hypothesis, it will first establish the history of keynesian economics through as a reaction to conditions which provided for the financial collapse of the Great Depression, and its implementation at Bretton Woods.
See similar documents : Economics
1
From Washington to Post-Washington Consensus: A Global Analysis
Presentation | 01/15/2009 | en | .doc | 9 pages
Latest in the category : Economics
1
Foreign direct investment (FDI) as an attractive option for companies
Term papers | 10/30/2009 | en | .doc | 4 pages
3
Title: Impact of oil price rise on economy: A case study of Europe
Term papers | 10/27/2009 | en | .doc | 3 pages
5
A study on the slowdown in the US real estates and its impact
Term papers | 10/27/2009 | en | .doc | 6 pages
Change Currency
Our guarantee :
How it works?
Quality guaranteed
Refunds
Secure payment
Who are we ?
