The democratic deficit and the role of the EU Parliament
Summary :
Table of Contents
- Introduction.
- The structural weakness of the EU Parliament.
- The uncertainty of the EU public support as a correlative consequence of EP weakness.
- The configuration of power in terms of media visibility and opinion formation.
- Conclusion.
- References.
Abstract
Since the beginning of the 90's and the end of the "permissive consensus", the democratic deficit of the European Union has increasingly become high on the agenda of scholars and decision-makers. Defined as "the growing dissonance between the essential requirements of modern democratic governments and actual conditions of EU management"(Chryssochoou 2003, 366), this democratic deficit undoubtedly shed light on the EU legitimacy. What is the nature of the problem and how can it be solved?
The main democratic criteria traditionally refer to the accountable, transparent, and representative character of the ruling political institutions as well as the support of the people (Eriksen and Fossum 2002, 401). If the parliament as a deliberative and representative political body of decision-making central is thus central to legitimate working of the EU (Gabel 2003, 290), the strength and the support of the public sphere are also strongly constituent of the democratic dynamic of such a institutional and political entity.
As pointed by Chryssochoou (2003, 366-374), the democratic deficit of the EU can be thus seen through an "institutional perspective", the lack of power of the European parliament, and through a "socio-psychological perspective", the weakness of the support of the people. Both perspectives are actually strongly related to each other: the effective power of the parliament improves the support of the people while this increasing support reinforces the legitimacy and the position of the legislative body.
The main democratic criteria traditionally refer to the accountable, transparent, and representative character of the ruling political institutions as well as the support of the people (Eriksen and Fossum 2002, 401). If the parliament as a deliberative and representative political body of decision-making central is thus central to legitimate working of the EU (Gabel 2003, 290), the strength and the support of the public sphere are also strongly constituent of the democratic dynamic of such a institutional and political entity.
As pointed by Chryssochoou (2003, 366-374), the democratic deficit of the EU can be thus seen through an "institutional perspective", the lack of power of the European parliament, and through a "socio-psychological perspective", the weakness of the support of the people. Both perspectives are actually strongly related to each other: the effective power of the parliament improves the support of the people while this increasing support reinforces the legitimacy and the position of the legislative body.
See similar documents : European union
1
Can the European Parliament ever break out of the cycle of failing public interests and legitimacy?
Term papers | 05/17/2009 | en | .doc | 5 pages
3
What does the European Union's so-called 'democratic deficit' stem from, and how could it be tackled?
Presentation | 01/13/2009 | en | .doc | 6 pages
Latest in the category : European union
2
Karen E. Smith "European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World"
Book review | 05/17/2009 | en | .doc | 4 pages
4
The completion of the WTO free trade agenda will produce both winners and losers in the EU: To what extend do you agree?
Term papers | 05/17/2009 | en | .doc | 5 pages
5
How does the European Commission foster the integration of the energy market?
Term papers | 05/17/2009 | en | .doc | 5 pages
Change Currency
Our guarantee :
How it works?
Quality guaranteed
Refunds
Secure payment
Who are we ?
