The Nature of Man “early Modern” anthropological suppositions and their role in the construction of the State

Type :

Presentation

Pages :

4 pages

Format :

.doc

Published date :

01/15/2009

Category :

Political science

Sub category :

Social sciences

Oboulo.com selection criteria

$ 6.95 Add to cart

Summary :

Introduction.
Hobbes' notion of the nature of man.
1. Hobbes' man: A very cynical or at least pessimistic.
2. The nature of man in Hobbes: The composition of two dimensions.
3. Speech and reason.
4. Pessimistic assumptions.
5. Hobbes' anthropology.
Locke's notion of the nature of man.
1. What does Locke exactly do when proposing his vision of man?
2. The principle at stake in Locke's anthropology.
Conclusion.
Bibliography.

Abstract

The opposition between the Ancients and the Moderns is often criticized. If there is anything like this, one may find it in the opposition of natural rights. In classical natural right, the nature is an essence to be realized; it is an aim, not a presuppose of society. On the contrary, in early modern natural right, nature is a series of subjective rights attached to the person.
But if these rights exist before society, this does not mean they disappear with it: the citizens may suspend or limit the use of some rights; they will not relinquish them to the sovereign. What I would like to show is that these subjective natural rights remain central in civil society. modern natural right is very diverse: what is understood as subjective rights remain very different from one author to another. I will here present Hobbes and Locke's anthropologies, often considered to open the two main directions of modern natural right: on Hobbes' side, positivism, on Locke's side, modern jusnaturalism. One may consider Hobbes' man a very cynical or at least pessimistic anthropology. Everyone heard of man being wolf to man, homo homini lupus, as said in De Cive. But actually, Hobbes' description of man, in the first part of Leviathan, goes far beyond that.