Troilus’ unwilling free will

Type :

Presentation

Pages :

5 pages

Format :

.doc

Published date :

07/17/2008

Category :

Philosophy & literature

Sub category :

Literature

Oboulo.com selection criteria

$ 10.95 Add to cart

Summary :

External influences to which Troilus actively submits.
1. Pandarus.
2. The concept of courtly love.
3. The idea of celestial authority personified as Nature, Love, Fortune, and Fate.
Troilus's passivity in his love affair with Criseyde.
Chaucer's toying with his audience.

Abstract

Chaucer's "troilus and Criseyde" consistently and emphatically stresses the absolute nature of courtly love and its proclivity to incite moral responsibility with relation to one's sense of free will and personal obligation. Chaucer toys with the notion of troilus' free will versus his manipulation by outside forces as a result of what J. Allan Mitchell in his essay, Romancing Ethics in Boethius, Chaucer, and Levinas: Fortune, Moral Luck and Erotic Adventure terms "radical passivity." (102). In troilus' inaction in the face of courtly love, he surrenders his ability to choose and succumbs to the will of the external forces of Fate, Fortune, and Love. The subjection of one's self to a higher authority consequently results in action out of necessity; thus a disavowal of freewill that paves fatalistic avenues which eventually seal one's fate. After this "point of choice," (referring to the moment when an individual must act on behalf of his free will or remain passive (Patch, 236)) troilus neglects any responsibility for his actions and instead relinquishes his fate to the will of external determinants. Simply put, the inaction of troilus at decisive moments gives rise, or necessitates, the action of other forces - his passivity causes the effects of his destiny. In true symmetrical form, Chaucer's narrative follows the same formula of cause and effect. The narrator acknowledges his sources as historical texts, therefore the reader already knows how the story ends from the very first page - the deterministic path for which the plot will proceed. Furthermore, Chaucer's narrator frequently reminds the reader that he is merely relaying the story of other authors, displacing any authorial responsibility he might be held accountable for and thus submitting his freedom of choice to external forces - his auctors. Essentially, Chaucer's narrative parallels the same fundamental question troilus poses of predestination, allotting his character's a certain degree of independence, though their outcome is already known. (Owen, 440).