Was the Macmillan governments decision to apply for membership of the European Communities the product of Britains declining global status?
Summary :
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Why Britain rejected involvement in the 1957 Treaty of Rome
- The Suez crisis of 1956
- The narrow relationship with America
- The breaking of the British Empire
- The growing isolation of Britain
- The decline of Commonwealth relations and accentuating decolonisation
- The shift in the British reaction
- The concept of sovereignty
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
Abstract
The fear that britain would become, as Labour's post-war Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin put it "just another european country" , was one of the main reasons to explain the British refusal to join a european supranational organisation. The Attlee government was indeed in favour of cooperation amongst Western european countries but did not want to be one of them . The view of the Foreign Office was that "Great britain must be viewed as a world power of the second rank and not merely as a unit as a federated Europe" . In fact, in 1945, britain was in a mood of triumph. It had won the war and was relatively intact. It was the only european country to have successfully defied Hitler for more than five years. It considered itself a great power, the centre of a Commonwealth and Empire covering one-fifth of the globe, and an equal of the Soviet Union and the United States of America. The British media even proudly referred to the United Kingdom as one of the Big Three and this was confirmed by Article 23 of the United Nations Charter which named britain as one of the five permanent members of the Security Council. This led to a kind of disdain for any special relations with other european countries. The foundation for what would become the european Union was then laid without the UK. However, just four years after its rejection of the 1957 Treaty of Rome, the macmillan government advanced its first application for membership to the european Economic Community (EEC). There were economic, political and security reasons for explaining this change in policy. The common denominator in these causes can be regarded as linked with a certain decline of britain's power in each of these spheres. But to what extent can we speak of britain's declining global status? What other reasons can be found?
Latest in the category : Political science
3
How Black Panthers party empowered the black community and the causes of its demise
Term papers | 10/21/2009 | en | .doc | 5 pages
Most downloaded in the last 30 days : Political science
1
An analysis of one of Winston Churchill's most famous speeches: "The Sinews of Peace" or the Iron Curtain speech.
Presentation | 07/07/2008 | en | .doc | 6 pages
2
A rhetorical criticism of Hillary Clinton's Beijing speech: Women's rights are human rights
Term papers | 04/22/2009 | en | .doc | 5 pages
From the same author : Political science
1
Discuss the main factors that determine product prices in the UK
Presentation | 02/28/2007 | en | .doc | 3 pages
3
Describe and explain the varying significance of the Far Right in the French Fifth Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany and Italy
Presentation | 02/28/2007 | en | .doc | 3 pages
Change Currency
Our guarantee :
How it works?
Quality guaranteed
Refunds
Secure payment
Who are we ?
