Welfare rights movement
Summary :
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- The case of King v. Smith
- The success of the case
- The appropriate regulation
- Goldberg v. Kelly
- Significance of the case
- Shapiro v. Thompson
- Success of the welfare rights movement
- The achievements of King, Goldberg, and Shapiro
- Welfare plight of African American's
- Conclusion
Abstract
The successes and failures of any rights movements can be defined by the victories and losses in the courtroom. The welfare rights movement had forward leaps and backward stumbles in its duration from 1960 to 1973 and Supreme Court cases to coincide. The movement's successes can be seen in King v. Smith, 392 U.S. 309 (1968), Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970), and Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969) and its failures in Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471 (1970) and San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973). These court cases influenced the strength and direction of the welfare rights movements and continue to have further implications for overall contemporary issues of inequality.
Perhaps the first pertinent victory occurred with King v. Smith. The appellee was a single mother of four who received no support from her children's biological father and therefore qualified to receive benefits from the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). However, the appellee had a boyfriend that came and stayed at her home a couple days of the week. When her caseworker found out that she had a boyfriend, her aid was taken away because of an Alabama "substitute father" regulation. 392 U.S., at 312. The court case was filed as a class action suit to counter the validity of the regulation.
Perhaps the first pertinent victory occurred with King v. Smith. The appellee was a single mother of four who received no support from her children's biological father and therefore qualified to receive benefits from the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). However, the appellee had a boyfriend that came and stayed at her home a couple days of the week. When her caseworker found out that she had a boyfriend, her aid was taken away because of an Alabama "substitute father" regulation. 392 U.S., at 312. The court case was filed as a class action suit to counter the validity of the regulation.
See similar documents : Social sciences
3
A Comparative study of national and local anti-poverty campaigns in the urban centers of America during the 1960's
Research papers | 02/19/2008 | en | .doc | 4 pages
4
"A Hideously Difficult Task": An Exploration of American Racial Identity through the Works of James Baldwin
Presentation | 06/20/2008 | en | .doc | 6 pages
Latest in the category : Social sciences
5
Anti-terrorism legislation and the case of Abousfian Abdelrazik
Term papers | 11/12/2009 | en | .doc | 6 pages
Change Currency
Our guarantee :
How it works?
Quality guaranteed
Refunds
Secure payment
Who are we ?
