Wheelchairs and liquid dreams
Summary :
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- People with disabilities
- The rights model and its role
- The issues raised by ADA
- Reasons why ADA was passed
- The success of ADA
- Conclusion
- Works cited
Abstract
Quenching one's thirst with a nice big glass of water could prove to be a mistake if you are in New York City and find yourself in need of a public restroom. Finding a place for relief in the big apple is not easy, and the city's streets and subways have become public toilets. The necessity for public toilets is apparent to all and in 1991, the Kaplan fund financed six coin operated toilets to be imported from France and tested in the city (Howard 114). These toilets catered to the needs of New York City nearly perfectly; however, they were not made to fit wheelchairs. Disability rights activists demanded that a toilet accommodating to the needs of the wheelchair bound be tested as well. They stated that it was their right, to have public toilets that accommodate all people, including those in wheelchairs. Activists succeeded in getting the city to test the larger, more obtrusive toilet kiosks, only to find that they were basically unused and the cost of the wheelchair accessible toilets was wasted (Howard 115).
The rule that New York City's decision was based on is the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). Activists were defending the rights of the disabled that are specifically enumerated in the ADA: "no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity" (42 USC 12132, 1990).
The rule that New York City's decision was based on is the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). Activists were defending the rights of the disabled that are specifically enumerated in the ADA: "no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity" (42 USC 12132, 1990).
Latest in the category : Civil law
3
Illinois State Constitution vis-à-vis Federal Constitution
Term papers | 09/03/2009 | en | .doc | 4 pages
From the same author : Civil law
1
Etica Moderno ed Il Principe - Modern ethics and the prince
Term papers | 07/28/2009 | en | .doc | 5 pages
2
Justice and the jury: The role of twelve in society
Term papers | 07/28/2009 | en | .doc | 3 pages
4
Gender imbalance and rural families: China's growing problem
Term papers | 07/28/2009 | en | .doc | 3 pages
5
The importance of the trial process: Fair and impartial?
Term papers | 07/28/2009 | en | .doc | 4 pages
Change Currency
Our guarantee :
How it works?
Quality guaranteed
Refunds
Secure payment
Who are we ?
